United States v. Bell
This text of United States v. Bell (United States v. Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before MONAHAN, STEPHENS, and DEERWESTER Appellate Military Judges
_________________________
UNITED STATES Appellee
v.
Emmanuel BELL First Lieutenant (O-2), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant
No. 202100137
Decided: 14 March 2022
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge: Stephen Keane
Sentence adjudged 21 January 2021 by a general court-martial con- vened at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: con- finement for 36 months, 1 and a dismissal.
For Appellant: Major Mary C. Finnen, USMC
1 The convening authority suspended 2 months of confinement adjudged for the Specification of Charge II pursuant to Defense Counsel’s request and the Military Judge’s concurring recommendation. United States v. Bell, NMCCA No. 202100137 Opinion of the Court
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
PER CURIAM: After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. 2 The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court
2 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Bell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bell-nmcca-2022.