United States v. Bell

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Bell

173 F. App'x 786

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided March 27, 2006·No. Nos. 04-13223, 04-13224; D.C. Docket No. 03-00210-CR-WS·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Lila Cleveland, appointed counsel for Jamie Demond Bell in this direct criminal appeal has moved to resubmit a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We also construe this motion as renewed motion to withdraw from further representation of the appellant. Counsel’s motion to resubmit the brief originally filed on March 29, 2005 is GRANTED. Moreover, our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s renewed motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bell’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Lila Cleveland, appointed counsel for Jamie Demond Bell in this direct criminal appeal has moved to resubmit a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We also construe this motion as renewed motion to withdraw from further representation of the appellant. Counsel’s motion to resubmit the brief originally filed on March 29, 2005 is GRANTED. Moreover, our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s renewed motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bell’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Bell, 173 F. App'x 786 (11th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

173 F. App'x 786 (United States v. Bell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related