United States v. Beireis
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSAugust 21, 2007 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-51723 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee v.
KENNETH LLOYD BEIREIS
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:05-CR-139
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Kenneth Lloyd Beireis has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Beireis has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 05-51723
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Beireis (United States v. Beireis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.