United States v. Beere

Second Circuit

United States v. Beere

415 F.2d 1005

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedOctober 3, 1969

DocketNo. 168, Docket 33699

StatusPublished

This text of 415 F.2d 1005 (United States v. Beere) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Beere, 415 F.2d 1005 (2d Cir. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Beere, who admittedly refused to .submit to induction into the Armed Forces, contended, in defense to an indictment in the District Court for Connecticut, that the Local Board improperly rejected his claims to exemption as a conscientious objector and a minister. Judge Blumenfeld rejected his contentions in a careful Memorandum of Decision, embodying findings of fact and conclusions of law. We perceive no error in his decision and affirm the judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Beere, who admittedly refused to .submit to induction into the Armed Forces, contended, in defense to an indictment in the District Court for Connecticut, that the Local Board improperly rejected his claims to exemption as a conscientious objector and a minister. Judge Blumenfeld rejected his contentions in a careful Memorandum of Decision, embodying findings of fact and conclusions of law. We perceive no error in his decision and affirm the judgment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

415 F.2d 1005, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-beere-ca2-1969.