United States v. Beasley

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Beasley

266 F. App'x 256

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Beasley. Read the opinion of the Court — 495 F.3d 142 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 26, 2008·No. 07-7441·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Curtis A. Beasley appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence under Fed.R.Crim.P. 33. We have reviewed the record and conclude that Beasley’s motion was untimely filed. See Fed. R.Crim.P. 33(b)(1). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Curtis A. Beasley appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence under Fed.R.Crim.P. 33. We have reviewed the record and conclude that Beasley’s motion was untimely filed. See Fed. R.Crim.P. 33(b)(1). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Beasley, 266 F. App'x 256 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

266 F. App'x 256 (United States v. Beasley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.