United States v. Beasley

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Beasley

266 F. App'x 256

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 26, 2008

Docket07-7441

StatusUnpublished

This text of 266 F. App'x 256 (United States v. Beasley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Beasley, 266 F. App'x 256 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Curtis A. Beasley appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence under Fed.R.Crim.P. 33. We have reviewed the record and conclude that Beasley’s motion was untimely filed. See Fed. R.Crim.P. 33(b)(1). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Curtis A. Beasley appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence under Fed.R.Crim.P. 33. We have reviewed the record and conclude that Beasley’s motion was untimely filed. See Fed. R.Crim.P. 33(b)(1). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

266 F. App'x 256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-beasley-ca4-2008.