United States v. Bear
This text of 568 F. App'x 246 (United States v. Bear) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Michael David Bear appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider the court’s earlier orders finding that its 2007 order of restitution, and withholding of money from defendant’s account toward satisfaction of the restitution, was proper. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Bear, No. 1:06-cr-00018-JPJ-l (W.D.Va. Nov. 27, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
568 F. App'x 246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bear-ca4-2014.