United States v. BEAN

Opinion

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before

DALY, HARRELL, and KORN Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Tyler S. BEAN

Corporal (E-4), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant

No. 202500008

_________________________

Decided: 31 March 2026

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: David C. Segraves

Sentence adjudged 13 September 2024 by a special court-martial tried at Marine Corps Air Station Miramar, San Diego, California, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-1 and confinement for 57 days. 1

For Appellant:

Commander Jeanne W. Murray, JAGC, USN

1 Appellant was credited with 57 days of pretrial confinement.

United States v. Bean, NMCCA No. 202500008 Opinion of the Court

For Appellee:

Lieutenant Commander Philip J. Corrigan, JAGC, USN Major Mary Claire Finnen, USMC

_________________________

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent but may be cited as persuasive authority under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2.

_______________________

PER CURIAM:

Appellant was convicted, consistent with his pleas, of two specifications of domestic violence, in violation of Article 128b, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), for committing a violent offense against his wife. 2 Appellant asserts one assignment of error: Did the Appellant’s Commanding Officer abuse his discretion in ordering that Appellant be placed in pretrial confinement? 3 We have carefully considered the matters raised by Appellant in his brief and find they do not require discussion or relief. 4 We have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. 5 The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

MARK K. JAMISON Clerk of Court

2 10 U.S.C. § 928b.

3 Raised pursuant to United States v. Grostefon, 12 M.J. 431 (C.M.A. 1982).

4 See United States v. Matias, 25 M.J. 356, 361 (C.M.A. 1987).

5 Articles 59 & 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.