United States v. BEAN

• Court: Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
• Decided: March 31, 2026
• Docket: 202500008
• Status: Published

Opinion

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before DALY, HARRELL, and KORN Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

UNITED STATES Appellee

v.

Tyler S. BEAN Corporal (E-4), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant

No. 202500008

Decided: 31 March 2026

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: David C. Segraves

Sentence adjudged 13 September 2024 by a special court-martial tried at Marine Corps Air Station Miramar, San Diego, California, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-1 and confinement for 57 days. 1

For Appellant: Commander Jeanne W. Murray, JAGC, USN

1 Appellant was credited with 57 days of pretrial confinement. United States v. Bean, NMCCA No. 202500008 Opinion of the Court

For Appellee: Lieutenant Commander Philip J. Corrigan, JAGC, USN Major Mary Claire Finnen, USMC

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent but may be cited as persuasive authority under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2.

_______________________

PER CURIAM: Appellant was convicted, consistent with his pleas, of two specifications of domestic violence, in violation of Article 128b, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), for committing a violent offense against his wife. 2 Appellant asserts one assignment of error: Did the Appellant’s Command- ing Officer abuse his discretion in ordering that Appellant be placed in pretrial confinement? 3 We have carefully considered the matters raised by Appellant in his brief and find they do not require discussion or relief. 4 We have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. 5 The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

MARK K. JAMISON Clerk of Court

2 10 U.S.C. § 928b.

3 Raised pursuant to United States v. Grostefon, 12 M.J. 431 (C.M.A. 1982).

4 See United States v. Matias, 25 M.J. 356, 361 (C.M.A. 1987).

5 Articles 59 & 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.