United States v. Bealon

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Bealon

585 F. App'x 82

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 24, 2014·No. No. 14-6832·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles Ennett Bealon, Jr., appeals the district court’s order granting counsel’s motion to withdraw from representation after counsel’s appointment pursuant to the district court’s standing order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Bealon, No. 7:08-cr-00038-FL-1 (E.D.N.C. May 21, 2014). We further deny Bealon’s motion to remand the case. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles Ennett Bealon, Jr., appeals the district court’s order granting counsel’s motion to withdraw from representation after counsel’s appointment pursuant to the district court’s standing order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Bealon, No. 7:08-cr-00038-FL-1 (E.D.N.C. May 21, 2014). We further deny Bealon’s motion to remand the case. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Bealon, 585 F. App'x 82 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

585 F. App'x 82 (United States v. Bealon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.