United States v. Bealon
This text of 585 F. App'x 82 (United States v. Bealon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Charles Ennett Bealon, Jr., appeals the district court’s order granting counsel’s motion to withdraw from representation after counsel’s appointment pursuant to the district court’s standing order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Bealon, No. 7:08-cr-00038-FL-1 (E.D.N.C. May 21, 2014). We further deny Bealon’s motion to remand the case. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
585 F. App'x 82, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bealon-ca4-2014.