United States v. Beal
This text of 321 F. App'x 688 (United States v. Beal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Martin Elery Beal appeals the 188-month sentence imposed following his conditional guilty plea to three counts of being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). He contends that the district court erred in treating his four prior convictions for first degree burglary under Or.Rev.Stat. § 164.225 as violent felonies under the Armed Career Criminal Act. This contention is foreclosed by United States v. Mayer, 560 F.3d 948, 962-63 (9th Cir.2009) (holding that first degree burglary under § 164.225 is categorically a “violent felony” under the Act’s residual clause).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
321 F. App'x 688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-beal-ca9-2009.