United States v. Beach

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-4431

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

EDWARD JOHN BEACH,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 05-4432

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

EDWARD JOHN BEACH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (CR-02-260-V)

Submitted: August 18, 2005 Decided: August 23, 2005

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Aaron Edmund Michel, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Gretchen C. F. Shappert, Interim United States Attorney, Kimlani S. Murray, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Edward John Beach seeks to

appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion to dismiss

his trial counsel and adopting the magistrate judge’s

recommendation and denying his motion to suppress evidence at his

criminal trial. Although Beach was found guilty after a jury trial

of various drug crimes, he has not yet been sentenced. This court

may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291

(2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.

§ 1292 (2000). The orders Beach seeks to appeal are neither final

orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for lack of jurisdiction. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal materials

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

- 3 -