United States v. BDO Seidman

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. BDO Seidman. Read the opinion of the Court — 337 F.3d 802
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided August 7, 2003·No. 02-3914·Published

Opinion

flatten fivtatefi Qtuurt at appealfi

For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

August7,2003

Before

Hon. KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner—Appellee,

Appeals from the United

States District Court for the Northern District of Nos. 02—3914 and 02—3915 v. Illinois, Eastern Division. BDO SEIDMAN, regarding promoter No. 02 C 4822 examination of 800 Seidman, Respondent—Appellee, Milton I. Shadur, Judge

James F. Holderman, Judge. APPEALS OF:

JOHN DOE and JANE DOE, and

RICHARD ROE and MARY ROE,

Proposed Intervenors.

I—JHI—lHHHWHI—Jhn—lh—lh‘dhu—d

The slip opinion issued in the above-entitled cause on July 23, 2003, is

AMENDED to indicate that Judge James F. Holderman as well as Judge Milton 1. Shadur handled the matter in the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. BDO Seidman, (7th Cir. 2003).

United States v. BDO Seidman (United States v. BDO Seidman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.