United States v. Bazemore

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Bazemore. Read the opinion of the Court — 186 F. App'x 337
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 21, 2006·No. 06-6068·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6068

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LEVON BAZEMORE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:05-cv-00371-SGW)

Submitted: June 7, 2006 Decided: June 21, 2006

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Levon Bazemore, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas L. Eckert, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Levon Bazemore, a federal prisoner, appeals the district

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge

and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See United States v. Bazemore, No. 7:05-cv-00371-SGW (W.D.

Va. Dec. 16, 2005). We grant Bazemore’s application to proceed on

appeal in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Bazemore, (4th Cir. 2006).

United States v. Bazemore (United States v. Bazemore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241