United States v. Baxter Co. Customhouse Brokers, Inc.

48 Cust. Ct. 529
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJanuary 25, 1962
DocketReap. Dec. 10152; Entry No. 1594
StatusPublished

This text of 48 Cust. Ct. 529 (United States v. Baxter Co. Customhouse Brokers, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Baxter Co. Customhouse Brokers, Inc., 48 Cust. Ct. 529 (cusc 1962).

Opinion

Ford, Judge:

The appeal for reappraisement listed above, has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation for the parties hereto:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise invoiced as seamless steel casing and EUE steel tubing is not on the final list (T.D. 54521) and that at the time of exportation such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for exportation to the United States pursuant to Section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, and that the export values are the invoice unit values, net, less ocean freight as invoiced.
IT IS FURTHER AGREED that this case be and hereby is submitted for decision upon the foregoing stipulation.

Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact, I find and hold the export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of [530]*5301956 (Public Law 927, 84th Congress), T.D. 45165, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved and that such export values are the invoice unit values, net, less ocean freight, as invoiced.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 Cust. Ct. 529, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-baxter-co-customhouse-brokers-inc-cusc-1962.