United States v. Baxter
This text of 301 F. App'x 672 (United States v. Baxter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
In these consolidated appeals, Richard Roy Baxter appeals from the 20-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release in District Court Case [673]*673No. 01-00748. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Baxter contends that the district court erred at sentencing by failing to consider the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). He also contends that his sentence is unreasonable in light of those factors. We conclude that the district court did not commit procedural error, and that Baxter’s sentence is substantively reasonable. See Rita v. United States, 551 U.S. 338, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 2468-69, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007); Gall v. United States, — U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 586, 598-602, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); see also United States v. Simtob, 485 F.3d 1058, 1062-63 (9th Cir.2007).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
301 F. App'x 672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-baxter-ca9-2008.