United States v. Batts

490 F. App'x 618
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 18, 2012·No. No. 12-7385·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Linwood Batts, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying for lack of jurisdic[619] tion his motion seeking an extension of time to file a motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012). On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Batts’ informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Batts has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Batts, 490 F. App'x 618 (4th Cir. 2012).

490 F. App'x 618 (United States v. Batts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related