United States v. Bates

24 F. Cas. 1041, 2 D.C. 1, 2 Cranch 1
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedJune 15, 1810
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 24 F. Cas. 1041 (United States v. Bates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Bates, 24 F. Cas. 1041, 2 D.C. 1, 2 Cranch 1 (circtddc 1810).

Opinion

[2]*2The Court

(Fitzhugh, J., absent, but concurring,)

was of opinion that the word “ draught,” in the Act of Assembly of Maryland, which was not in the English statute, made a difference.; and that a draft might be made by a person who had no right to draw.

The sentence of the Court was twenty stripes.

Cranch, C. J.,

said that it was the first case under this Act of Assembly which had come' before the Court; and perhaps there was some ground to doubt whether the case was strictly within it, as explained by the English authorities. For these reasons, the Court inflicted a lighter punishment than they would otherwise have done. ■

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anzine v. United States
260 F. 827 (Ninth Circuit, 1919)
Palmer v. Gallup
16 Conn. 555 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1844)
United States v. Brown
24 F. Cas. 1246 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia, 1827)
North River Steam Boat Co. v. Hoffman
5 Johns. Ch. 300 (New York Court of Chancery, 1821)
Corp v. Vermilye
3 Johns. 145 (New York Supreme Court, 1808)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 F. Cas. 1041, 2 D.C. 1, 2 Cranch 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bates-circtddc-1810.