United States v. Bates
This text of 216 F. App'x 644 (United States v. Bates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Clifford Bates appeals his sentence, which was reaffirmed on a limited remand pursuant to United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005). Bates had no constitutional or statutory right to allocute during the limited remand. See United States v. Silva, 2006 WL - (9th Cir.).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
216 F. App'x 644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bates-ca9-2007.