United States v. Bassett
This text of United States v. Bassett (United States v. Bassett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6002
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CLARENCE LEE BASSETT, JR., a/k/a Junie,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (4:03-cr-00069-RGD-TEM-1)
Submitted: June 22, 2009 Decided: June 29, 2009
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clarence Lee Bassett, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Rae McKeel, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Clarence Bassett, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for a judicial inquiry and seeking an
evidentiary hearing on the Government’s refusal to file a Fed.
R. Crim. P. 35 motion. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Bassett, No.
4:03-cr-00069-RGD-TEM-1 (E.D. Va. Dec. 5, 2008). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Bassett, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bassett-ca4-2009.