United States v. Bass

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Bass

22 F. App'x 81

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 25, 2000·No. 00-6309·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Alvin Bass seeks to appeal the district court’s order construing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) as a motion Sled under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000) and dis *82 missing it without prejudice as successive. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Bass, Nos. CR-90-352-A; CA-97-754-AM (E.D.Va. Jan. 4, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Alvin Bass seeks to appeal the district court’s order construing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) as a motion Sled under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000) and dis *82 missing it without prejudice as successive. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Bass, Nos. CR-90-352-A; CA-97-754-AM (E.D.Va. Jan. 4, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED

United States v. Bass, 22 F. App'x 81 (4th Cir. 2000).

Pincite

22 F. App'x 81 (United States v. Bass) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related