United States v. Bartlett
73 F.2d 1015, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 2974
This text of 73 F.2d 1015 (United States v. Bartlett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Bartlett, 73 F.2d 1015, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 2974 (9th Cir. 1934).
Opinion
The record in this ease does not present the question of the sufficiency of the evidence to justify the judgment. Continental Nat. Bank et al. v. National City Bank of New York (C. C. A.) 69 F.(2d) 312. This being the only assignment of error presented by the appellant, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Continental Nat. Bank v. National City Bank of New York
69 F.2d 312 (Ninth Circuit, 1934)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
73 F.2d 1015, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 2974, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bartlett-ca9-1934.