United States v. Bartle

District of Columbia

United States v. Bartle

1 D.C. 236

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia

DecidedJune 15, 1805

StatusPublished

This text of 1 D.C. 236 (United States v. Bartle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Bartle, 1 D.C. 236 (D.D.C. 1805).

Pincite

Opinion

But the CouRT

(neni. con.) refused to give the instruction as prayed.

The Court was further of opinion that it was not necessary to prove that Coryell was interrupting the business, or impeded it any way, but that the possession was in the carpenter and bricklayer, and either of them had a right to order away all persons having no right to enter the building ; and if they refused to depart, had a right to put them out without using any unnecessary violence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

But the CouRT

(neni. con.) refused to give the instruction as prayed.

The Court was further of opinion that it was not necessary to prove that Coryell was interrupting the business, or impeded it any way, but that the possession was in the carpenter and bricklayer, and either of them had a right to order away all persons having no right to enter the building ; and if they refused to depart, had a right to put them out without using any unnecessary violence.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 D.C. 236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bartle-dcd-1805.