United States v. Bartle
This text of 24 F. Cas. 1020 (United States v. Bartle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
was further of opinion that it was not necessary to prove that Coryell was interrupting the business, or impeded it any way, but that the possession was in the carpenter and bricklayer, and either of them had a right to order away all persons having no right to enter the building; and if they refused to depart, had a right to put them out without using any unnecessary violence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 F. Cas. 1020, 1 Cranch 236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bartle-circtddc-1805.