United States v. Barry Stanley Washington

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Barry Stanley Washington

74 F.3d 1234, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39090, 1996 WL 23168

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 23, 1996

Docket95-7059

StatusPublished

This text of 74 F.3d 1234 (United States v. Barry Stanley Washington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Barry Stanley Washington, 74 F.3d 1234, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39090, 1996 WL 23168 (4th Cir. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

74 F.3d 1234
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
Barry Stanley WASHINGTON, Defendant--Appellant.

No. 95-7059.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 11, 1996.
Decided Jan. 23, 1996.

Barry Stanley Washington, Appellant Pro Se.

Robert Michael Hamilton, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying his motion for transcripts and his motion for appointment of counsel.* We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. United States v. Washington, No. CR-92-296-1-WS (M.D.N.C. May 22, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

*

The magistrate judge was authorized to enter the order in this matter. 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(b)(1)(A) (1988)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

74 F.3d 1234
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
Barry Stanley WASHINGTON, Defendant--Appellant.

No. 95-7059.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 11, 1996.
Decided Jan. 23, 1996.

Barry Stanley Washington, Appellant Pro Se.

Robert Michael Hamilton, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying his motion for transcripts and his motion for appointment of counsel.* We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. United States v. Washington, No. CR-92-296-1-WS (M.D.N.C. May 22, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

*

The magistrate judge was authorized to enter the order in this matter. 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(b)(1)(A) (1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 F.3d 1234, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39090, 1996 WL 23168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-barry-stanley-washington-ca4-1996.