United States v. Barron

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Barron

138 F.3d 809

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 7, 1998·No. Nos. 96-36058, 96-36059·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular' active judges of this court, it is ordered that these eases be reheard by the en bane court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. [810]*810The three-judge panel opinion, United States v. Barron, 127 F.3d 890 (9th Cir.1997), amended by slip. op. 1867, 136 F.3d 675 (March 6, 1998), and the three-judge panel unpublished disposition, United States v. Thompson, 131 F.3d 150 (9th Cir.1997), are withdrawn.

These cases are consolidated for rehearing en banc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular' active judges of this court, it is ordered that these eases be reheard by the en bane court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. [810]*810The three-judge panel opinion, United States v. Barron, 127 F.3d 890 (9th Cir.1997), amended by slip. op. 1867, 136 F.3d 675 (March 6, 1998), and the three-judge panel unpublished disposition, United States v. Thompson, 131 F.3d 150 (9th Cir.1997), are withdrawn.

These cases are consolidated for rehearing en banc.

United States v. Barron, 138 F.3d 809 (9th Cir. 1998).

Pincite

138 F.3d 809 (United States v. Barron) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related