United States v. Barron

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Barron

138 F.3d 809

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedApril 7, 1998

DocketNos. 96-36058, 96-36059

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 138 F.3d 809 (United States v. Barron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Barron, 138 F.3d 809 (9th Cir. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular' active judges of this court, it is ordered that these eases be reheard by the en bane court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. [810]*810The three-judge panel opinion, United States v. Barron, 127 F.3d 890 (9th Cir.1997), amended by slip. op. 1867, 136 F.3d 675 (March 6, 1998), and the three-judge panel unpublished disposition, United States v. Thompson, 131 F.3d 150 (9th Cir.1997), are withdrawn.

These cases are consolidated for rehearing en banc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular' active judges of this court, it is ordered that these eases be reheard by the en bane court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. [810]*810The three-judge panel opinion, United States v. Barron, 127 F.3d 890 (9th Cir.1997), amended by slip. op. 1867, 136 F.3d 675 (March 6, 1998), and the three-judge panel unpublished disposition, United States v. Thompson, 131 F.3d 150 (9th Cir.1997), are withdrawn.

These cases are consolidated for rehearing en banc.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

138 F.3d 809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-barron-ca9-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack