United States v. Barron

114 F. App'x 147
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedNovember 17, 2004
Docket04-40188
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 114 F. App'x 147 (United States v. Barron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Barron, 114 F. App'x 147 (5th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Jaime Barron appeals from his guilty-plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute more than 500 grams but less *148 than five kilograms of cocaine. He argues that his three prior uncounseled misdemeanor convictions were ineligible for use in calculating his criminal history score because the waivers of his right to counsel in those cases were invalid. He asserts that, without the usage of these prior convictions, he should have been awarded a downward adjustment pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2.

Barron has failed to meet his burden to show that those waivers were invalid. See Iowa v. Tovar, 541 U.S. 77, 124 S.Ct. 1379, 1390, 158 L.Ed.2d 209 (2004). The district court’s use of Barron’s prior convictions for purposes of determining his criminal history score was therefore proper. Because Barron’s criminal history score exceeded one, he was ineligible for the U.S.S.G. § 501.2(a) adjustment. Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Guerrero-Robledo
565 F.3d 940 (Fifth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 F. App'x 147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-barron-ca5-2004.