United States v. Barrington

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-10312

Conference Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BENJAMIN BARRINGTON,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:86-CR-052-D

- - - - - - - - - - (October 18, 1995)

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and REAVLEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Benjamin Barrington has filed

a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

and we have independently reviewed counsel's brief, the points

raised by Barrington in response to that brief, and the record,

and found no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused

from further responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

*

Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.