United States v. Barrientos-Velez
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Sebastian Barrientos-Velez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 51-month sentence imposed for illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), [731]*731Barrientos-Velez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Appellant has filed a pro se brief. No answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
388 F. App'x 730 (United States v. Barrientos-Velez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.