United States v. Barreto

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Barreto

369 F. App'x 996

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided March 26, 2010·No. No. 09-15070·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

William E. Folsom, appointed counsel for James Sunshine Barreto, in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appel[997] lant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Barreto’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

William E. Folsom, appointed counsel for James Sunshine Barreto, in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appel[997] lant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Barreto’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Barreto, 369 F. App'x 996 (11th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

369 F. App'x 996 (United States v. Barreto) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related