United States v. Barrera-Campos
This text of 97 F. App'x 205 (United States v. Barrera-Campos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Milton Barrera-Campos appeals an order of the district court denying his motion to quash a detainer issued against him in relation to a violation of supervised release. We dismiss the appeal as moot.
The record indicates that the sentence imposed upon revocation of Campos’ supervised release ended on March 5, 2004. At this juncture, therefore, “there is nothing for us to remedy[.]” Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 18, 118 S.Ct. 978, 140 L.Ed.2d 43 (1998) (concluding that a petition for writ of habeas corpus challenging an order revoking parole was moot because no case-or-controversy standing under Article III remained after petitioner had completed the entire term of imprisonment underlying his parole revocation).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
97 F. App'x 205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-barrera-campos-ca9-2004.