United States v. Barraza

129 F. App'x 107
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 20, 2005
Docket04-50666
StatusUnpublished

This text of 129 F. App'x 107 (United States v. Barraza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Barraza, 129 F. App'x 107 (5th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: * .

Reynaldo Barraza appeals the sentence that he received after he pleaded guilty to importing marijuana and to possessing with intent to distribute marijuana. Barraza argues that he was entitled to a two-level reduction in his base offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 because, as a courier, he was a minor participant in a drug-smuggling operation.

Whether a defendant is entitled to a § 3B1.2 adjustment “turns upon culpability, not courier status.” United States v.

Buenrostro, 868 F.2d 135, 138 (5th Cir.1989). “[T]o qualify as a minor participant, a defendant must have been peripheral to the advancement of the illicit activity.” United States v. Miranda, 248 F.3d 434, 446-47 (5th Cir.2001). In light of Barraza’s admission that, had he successfully crossed the border in his courier status, he would have accepted even more money to to continue on another leg of the trip, the district court did not clearly err when it denied the reduction. See United States v. Deavours, 219 F.3d 400, 404 (5th Cir .2000).

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Deavours
219 F.3d 400 (Fifth Circuit, 2000)
United States v. Miranda
248 F.3d 434 (Fifth Circuit, 2001)
United States v. Leonard Orozco Buenrostro
868 F.2d 135 (Fifth Circuit, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
129 F. App'x 107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-barraza-ca5-2005.