United States v. Barragan-Gonzalez
This text of 78 F. App'x 603 (United States v. Barragan-Gonzalez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Raymundo Barragan-Gonzalez appeals his conviction and 66-month sentence imposed after his guilty plea to being an alien found in the United States following his official deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Barragan-Gonzalez’ counsel has submitted a brief stating that he has found no meritorious issues for review. No supplemental pro se brief has been filed, nor did the government file a brief.
Our consideration of counsel’s brief and our independent review of the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no issues requiring further review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
78 F. App'x 603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-barragan-gonzalez-ca9-2003.