United States v. Barra

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 7, 1996·No. 95-40809·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-40809

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JAMES ROBERT BARRA, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:95-CR-2

- - - - - - - - - -

May 1, 1996

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* James Robert Barra appeals his conviction for possession of firearms after having been convicted of the felony offense of possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance. He argues that his conviction should be reversed because the district court permitted the Government to amend the indictment as to an essential element of the offense, the evidence of a prior conviction was insufficient, and the district court abused its discretion in denying his motion for a new trial based on

Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

No. 95-40809

-2-

prosecutorial misconduct during closing argument. Our review of the record, the arguments, and authorities convince us that no reversible error was committed. The indictment was not “amended” because the location of the predicate conviction was surplusage, and Barra was not misled. See United States v. Prior, 546 F.2d 1254, 1257 (5th Cir. 1977); United States v. Wylie, 919 F.2d 969, 973 (5th Cir. 1990). Hence, the evidence was sufficient to prove the element that Barra was previously convicted of a felony. See United States v. Bell, 678 F.2d 547, 549 (5th Cir. 1982) (en banc), aff'd, 462 U.S. 356 (1983). Further, the district court did not abuse its discretion in overruling the objection to the prosecutor's statements in closing argument and denying the motion for a new trial. See United States v. Wallace, 32 F.3d 921, 926 (5th Cir. 1994).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Barra, (5th Cir. 1996).

United States v. Barra (United States v. Barra) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Wallace
32 F.3d 921 (Fifth Circuit, 1994)
Bell v. United States
462 U.S. 356 (Supreme Court, 1983)
United States v. Nelson Bell
678 F.2d 547 (Fifth Circuit, 1982)
United States v. Vickie J. Wylie
919 F.2d 969 (Fifth Circuit, 1990)