United States v. Barr
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v.
Crim. Action N0. 04cr375
DESMOND BARR,
Defendant.
ORDER
'I`his matter comes before the Court upon the receipt of a Report and Recommendation dated October 26, 201 0, from Magistrate Judge Deborah A. Robinson, that recommends revoking Defendant’s supervised release. No objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation have been received by the Court.
Accordingly, it is this day of November, 2010,
ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the supervised release is revoked; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the case is hereby scheduled for Re-sentencing on
9/5.,\_;, (¢'9/,01;>// at ‘).'B¢_j.a.m./p.-n~r."in Courtroom 28A.
\
C’%s v COLLEEN KOLLAR'ZKOTELLY United States District Judge Copies to: (see next page) ”N) Copies to: Mary Petras, AFPD. Angela George, AUSA Kurt H. Panzer, Jr., US Probation Off`icer Magistrate Judge Deborah Robinson Pretrial Services
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Barr (United States v. Barr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.