United States v. Barnhardt

N.D. Ohio

United States v. Barnhardt

24 F. Cas. 1016, 20 Int. Rev. Rec. 137

DecidedJuly 1, 1874

StatusPublished

This text of 24 F. Cas. 1016 (United States v. Barnhardt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Barnhardt, 24 F. Cas. 1016, 20 Int. Rev. Rec. 137 (N.D. Ohio 1874).

Pincite

Opinion

On motion for a new trial, held, that a single sale of spirituous liquor makes a retail dealer therein under the law; (2) that where license or payment of tax is relied upon in defence, it must be shown by the defendant, and the government is not bound to show want of license or payment; (3) that intent to defraud the government need not be proven to convict. A new trial is therefore refused.

Geo. Willey, U. S. Atty.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On motion for a new trial, held, that a single sale of spirituous liquor makes a retail dealer therein under the law; (2) that where license or payment of tax is relied upon in defence, it must be shown by the defendant, and the government is not bound to show want of license or payment; (3) that intent to defraud the government need not be proven to convict. A new trial is therefore refused.

Geo. Willey, U. S. Atty.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 F. Cas. 1016, 20 Int. Rev. Rec. 137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-barnhardt-ohnd-1874.