United States v. Barnett
This text of United States v. Barnett (United States v. Barnett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 96-40037 Conference Calendar __________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
GARY W. BARNETT,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:90-CR-7-1 - - - - - - - - - - August 21, 1996 Before KING, DUHÉ, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Gary W. Barnett appeals the revocation of his probation. He
argues that his conduct amounted to no more than technical
violations of his conditions of probation and thus, should not
warrant revocation. We have carefully reviewed the record and
appellate arguments. We detect no abuse of discretion in the
district court's order of revocation. See United States v. King,
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 96-40037 -2-
990 F.2d 190, 193 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 223
(1993).
This appeal is frivolous and is thus DISMISSED. See 5th
Cir. R. 42.2. Counsel is warned that pursuing frivolous appeals
invites sanctions. See United States v. Burleson, 22 F.3d 93, 95
(5th Cir.), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 283 (1994).
DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Barnett, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-barnett-ca5-1996.