United States v. Barge Boulder
This text of 343 F.2d 175 (United States v. Barge Boulder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The United States filed a libel in rem against the Barge Boulder charging oil pollution in violation of the Oil Pollution Act of June 7, 1924, 33 U.S.C. §§ 433, 434. After trial, the district court found in favor of the Barge Boulder and dismissed the libel on the merits. The United States moved for a new trial. In denying that motion the district court set forth its findings of fact and conclusions of law. 1 The findings of fact are not clearly erroneous. See McAllister v. United States, 1954, 348 U.S. 19, 20, 75 S.Ct. 6, 99 L.Ed. 20; Roper v. United States, 1961, 368 U.S. 20, 23, 82 S.Ct. 5, 7 L.Ed.2d 1; Guzman v. Pichirilo, 1962, 369 U.S. 698, 702, 82 S.Ct. 1095, 8 L.Ed. 2d 205. We agree with the conclusions of law.
The judgment of the district court is therefore
Affirmed.
. Reported in 238 F.Supp. 748.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
343 F.2d 175, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6181, 1967 A.M.C. 561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-barge-boulder-ca5-1965.