United States v. Barge Boulder

343 F.2d 175, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6181, 1967 A.M.C. 561
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMarch 18, 1965
Docket21585_1
StatusPublished

This text of 343 F.2d 175 (United States v. Barge Boulder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Barge Boulder, 343 F.2d 175, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6181, 1967 A.M.C. 561 (5th Cir. 1965).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The United States filed a libel in rem against the Barge Boulder charging oil pollution in violation of the Oil Pollution Act of June 7, 1924, 33 U.S.C. §§ 433, 434. After trial, the district court found in favor of the Barge Boulder and dismissed the libel on the merits. The United States moved for a new trial. In denying that motion the district court set forth its findings of fact and conclusions of law. 1 The findings of fact are not clearly erroneous. See McAllister v. United States, 1954, 348 U.S. 19, 20, 75 S.Ct. 6, 99 L.Ed. 20; Roper v. United States, 1961, 368 U.S. 20, 23, 82 S.Ct. 5, 7 L.Ed.2d 1; Guzman v. Pichirilo, 1962, 369 U.S. 698, 702, 82 S.Ct. 1095, 8 L.Ed. 2d 205. We agree with the conclusions of law.

The judgment of the district court is therefore

Affirmed.

1

. Reported in 238 F.Supp. 748.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McAllister v. United States
348 U.S. 19 (Supreme Court, 1954)
Roper v. United States
368 U.S. 20 (Supreme Court, 1961)
Guzman v. Pichirilo
369 U.S. 698 (Supreme Court, 1962)
United States v. Boulder
238 F. Supp. 748 (W.D. Louisiana, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
343 F.2d 175, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6181, 1967 A.M.C. 561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-barge-boulder-ca5-1965.