United States v. Barber

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Barber. Read the opinion of the Court — 226 F. App'x 255
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 29, 2008·No. 08-6093·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6093

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DONALD RAY BARBER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:93-cr-00124-FDW-1; 3:07-cv-00454-FDW)

Submitted: May 22, 2008 Decided: May 29, 2008

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donald Ray Barber, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C.F. Shappert, United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Donald Ray Barber appeals from the denial of his motion

for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. United States v. Barber, Nos.

3:93-cr-00124-FDW-1, 3:07-cv-00454-FDW (W.D.N.C. Oct. 25, 2007).

In addition, we decline to consider the claim raised by Barber for

the first time on appeal. See Muth v. United States, 1 F.3d 246,

250 (4th Cir. 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Barber, (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Barber (United States v. Barber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

D.P. Muth J.P. Muth v. United States
1 F.3d 246 (Fourth Circuit, 1993)