United States v. Baquavious Rivers

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 19, 2019·No. 19-10090·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 19-10090 Document: 00515243317 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/19/2019

CORRECTED December 19, 2019

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED November 18, 2019 No. 19-10090 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

BAQUAVIOUS RIVERS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:17-CR-460-10

Before HAYNES, DUNCAN, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Baquavious Rivers has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rivers has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 19-10090 Document: 00515243317 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/19/2019

No. 19-10090

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Baquavious Rivers, (5th Cir. 2019).

United States v. Baquavious Rivers (United States v. Baquavious Rivers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)