United States v. Banks
This text of United States v. Banks (United States v. Banks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 21, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
No. 02-11213 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
PATRICK RYNARD BANKS,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:98-CR-298-2-D --------------------
Before JOLLY, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Patrick Rynard Banks has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Banks has received a
copy of counsel’s motion and brief, but has filed no response.
Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no
nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See
5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Banks, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-banks-ca5-2003.