United States v. Banda

331 F. App'x 311
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Banda. Read the opinion of the Court — 236 F. App'x 955
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 18, 2009·No. 08-20677·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the judgment in a criminal ease, Issac Joaquin Banda presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Rawls, 85 F.3d 240, 242-44 (5th Cir.1996), which rejected a Commerce Clause challenge to the felon-in-possession-of-a-firearm statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). See United States v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir.2001). The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, the Government’s unopposed motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a letter brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Banda, 331 F. App'x 311 (5th Cir. 2009).

331 F. App'x 311 (United States v. Banda) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Rawls
85 F.3d 240 (Fifth Circuit, 1996)
United States v. Daugherty
264 F.3d 513 (Fifth Circuit, 2001)