United States v. Baltimore & Ohio R. R.

U.S. Customs Court

United States v. Baltimore & Ohio R. R.

4 Cust. Ct. 720, 1940 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3996

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedMarch 14, 1940

DocketNo. 4791; Entry Nos. 3921, 4178, 3986, 4082

StatusPublished

This text of 4 Cust. Ct. 720 (United States v. Baltimore & Ohio R. R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Baltimore & Ohio R. R., 4 Cust. Ct. 720, 1940 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3996 (cusc 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Keefe, Judge:

These appeals to reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto.

It is hebeby stipulated and agbeed, subject to the approval of the Court, that the market value or price at the time of exportation of the surface coated paper easier eggs, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, is the unit appraised value, plus 10%, plus packing.

It is further stipulated and agreed that there was no higher export value for the merchandise herein at the time of exportation.

It is further stipulated and agreed that this case may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the unit appraised values, plus 10 per centum, plus packing. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Keefe, Judge:

These appeals to reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto.

It is hebeby stipulated and agbeed, subject to the approval of the Court, that the market value or price at the time of exportation of the surface coated paper easier eggs, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, is the unit appraised value, plus 10%, plus packing.

It is further stipulated and agreed that there was no higher export value for the merchandise herein at the time of exportation.

It is further stipulated and agreed that this case may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the unit appraised values, plus 10 per centum, plus packing. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Cust. Ct. 720, 1940 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3996, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-baltimore-ohio-r-r-cusc-1940.