United States v. Ballet
This text of United States v. Ballet (United States v. Ballet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-30162 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
LEVAY BALLET, also known as Pookie,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 99-CR-329-11-T -------------------- August 20, 2002
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Levay Ballet appeals following his guilty-plea conviction
and sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute
cocaine base. He argues that, because the indictment did not
specify a quantity of cocaine base, his sentence of 161 months’
imprisonment was in violation of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S.
466 (2000). Ballet’s sentence was below the statutory maximum
set out in the default sentencing provision for cocaine in 21
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-30162 -2-
U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C), and his argument is without merit. See
United States v. Clinton, 256 F.3d 311, 314 (5th Cir.), cert.
denied, 122 S. Ct. 492 (2001).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Ballet, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ballet-ca5-2002.