United States v. Ballestero
This text of 203 F. App'x 512 (United States v. Ballestero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Robert Ballestero pled guilty to distributing crack cocaine (Count Three) and being a felon in possession of a firearm (Count Four) and was sentenced to eighty-seven months of imprisonment. On appeal, he argues that the district court improperly gave him six criminal history points for two Michigan convictions: (1) breaking without entering, and (2) receiving and concealing stolen property, which occurred more than fifteen years prior to the commencement of his instant offenses in violation of U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 4A1.2(e) (2005). For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
We review a district court’s factual findings concerning sentencing factors for clear error and its legal determinations de novo. United States v. France, 164 F.3d 203, 209 (4th Cir.1998). We find no error in the district court’s conclusion that Bal-lestero was serving sentences of imprisonment for these two state offenses during the relevant fifteen-year period as discussed in USSG § 4A1.2, comment, (n.2). Accordingly, we affirm.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
203 F. App'x 512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ballestero-ca4-2006.