United States v. Ball

334 F. App'x 44
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 14, 2009
DocketNo. 06-4135
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 334 F. App'x 44 (United States v. Ball) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Ball, 334 F. App'x 44 (8th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court of the United States. See Ball v. United States, 556 U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 2049, 173 L.Ed.2d 1130 (2009). The Supreme Court granted certiorari, vacated this court’s judgment in United States v. Ball, 499 F.3d 890 (8th Cir.2007), and remanded the case for further consideration in light of Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007).

Having reviewed Clint Ball’s sentence, we conclude the sentence does not run afoul of Gall. However, after our initial ruling in this case, the Supreme Court issued an opinion in Arizona v. Gant, 556 [45]*45U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 1710, 173 L.Ed.2d 485 (2009), which may be relevant to the issues here. Therefore, without vacating the district court’s judgment, we remand for the district court to analyze the suppression issues in light of Gant, and for a further evidentiary hearing, if the district court deems such a hearing is necessary.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Clint Ball
449 F. App'x 527 (Eighth Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
334 F. App'x 44, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ball-ca8-2009.