United States v. Balderas

169 F. App'x 335
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 24, 2006
Docket04-51140
StatusUnpublished

This text of 169 F. App'x 335 (United States v. Balderas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Balderas, 169 F. App'x 335 (5th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

*336 PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Julia Ann Balderas has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Balderas has filed a response to counsel’s motion to withdraw. Our independent review of the brief, Balderas’s response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. We decline to address any claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, without prejudice to Balderas’s right to assert such claims in a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. United States v. Higdon, 832 F.2d 312, 314 (5th Cir.1987). Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Tommy Ray Higdon
832 F.2d 312 (Fifth Circuit, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 F. App'x 335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-balderas-ca5-2006.