United States v. Baker
This text of 656 F. App'x 19 (United States v. Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Irvin Jayoine Lee Baker appeals the district court’s orders granting the Government’s motion to amend the preliminary order of forfeiture and denying Baker’s motions for an extension of time and stay of forfeiture. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Baker, No. 3:14-cr-00041-GMG-JES-1 (N.D. W. Va. Apr. 5, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
656 F. App'x 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-baker-ca4-2016.