United States v. Bain
This text of 17 F. App'x 180 (United States v. Bain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
William Melvin Bain appeals the district court’s judgment and commitment order revoking supervised release and sentencing him to 24 months’ imprisonment. We *181 find that the district court had jurisdiction to conduct the hearing. We further find that Bain’s right to a reasonably prompt revocation hearing was not violated. See United States v. Scott, 850 F.2d 316, 319-20 (7th Cir.1988). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
17 F. App'x 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bain-ca4-2001.