United States v. Bailey

D.C. Circuit

United States v. Bailey

4 F.3d 1004, 303 U.S. App. D.C. 295, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 34665, 1993 WL 414705

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedOctober 8, 1993

DocketNo. 90-3119

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 4 F.3d 1004 (United States v. Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Bailey, 4 F.3d 1004, 303 U.S. App. D.C. 295, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 34665, 1993 WL 414705 (D.C. Cir. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s Suggestion For Rehearing En Banc and the response thereto have been circulated to the full Court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular active service voted in favor of the suggestion. Upon consideration of the foregoing it is

[1005]*1005ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the suggestion is granted and this case will be reheard by the Court sitting en banc.

It is FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the judgment of the court filed herein on June 18, 1993, 995 F.2d 1113, is hereby vacated,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI