United States v. Bailey

D.C. Circuit

United States v. Bailey

4 F.3d 1004, 303 U.S. App. D.C. 295, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 34665, 1993 WL 414705

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided October 8, 1993·No. No. 90-3119·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s Suggestion For Rehearing En Banc and the response thereto have been circulated to the full Court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular active service voted in favor of the suggestion. Upon consideration of the foregoing it is

[1005] ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the suggestion is granted and this case will be reheard by the Court sitting en banc.

It is FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the judgment of the court filed herein on June 18, 1993, 995 F.2d 1113, is hereby vacated,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s Suggestion For Rehearing En Banc and the response thereto have been circulated to the full Court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular active service voted in favor of the suggestion. Upon consideration of the foregoing it is

[1005] ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the suggestion is granted and this case will be reheard by the Court sitting en banc.

It is FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the judgment of the court filed herein on June 18, 1993, 995 F.2d 1113, is hereby vacated,

United States v. Bailey, 4 F.3d 1004, 303 U.S. App. D.C. 295, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 34665, 1993 WL 414705 (D.C. Cir. 1993).

Pincite

4 F.3d 1004 (United States v. Bailey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related