United States v. Bailey

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Bailey. Read the opinion of the Court — 92 F. App'x 99
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 25, 2001·No. 01-20130·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-20130 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

AUBREY LEON BAILEY,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-556-ALL -------------------- October 25, 2001

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Aubrey Leon Bailey appeals from his conviction of one count

of being a felon in possession of a firearm. He argues that the

factual basis tendered was insufficient to support his conviction

on the federal firearms charge because the interstate commerce

nexus required by 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) was not established.

“This court has repeatedly emphasized that the constitutionality

of § 922(g)(1) is not open to question.” United States v. De

Leon, 170 F.3d 494, 499 (5th Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S.

863 (1999). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Bailey, (5th Cir. 2001).

United States v. Bailey (United States v. Bailey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Thomas De Leon
170 F.3d 494 (Fifth Circuit, 1999)