United States v. Bailey

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Bailey

389 F.2d 63

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 23, 1968

DocketNos. 11634, 11635 and 11728

StatusPublished

This text of 389 F.2d 63 (United States v. Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Bailey, 389 F.2d 63 (4th Cir. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appealing against their convictions in the District Court for bank robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 2113, in Lynchburg, Virginia on June 28, 1966, John Lee Bailey, Lester Dean Millhouse and Oscar Tyler, Jr., all assign trial procedural errors, and Mill-house . and Tyler additionally question the sufficiency in' law of the proof of their guilt. We find no substantial mistakes of procedure and find evidence aplenty to sustain the judgments.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Appealing against their convictions in the District Court for bank robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 2113, in Lynchburg, Virginia on June 28, 1966, John Lee Bailey, Lester Dean Millhouse and Oscar Tyler, Jr., all assign trial procedural errors, and Mill-house . and Tyler additionally question the sufficiency in' law of the proof of their guilt. We find no substantial mistakes of procedure and find evidence aplenty to sustain the judgments.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

389 F.2d 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bailey-ca4-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack